Topic > Karl Marx's Comparison of Human Nature and Modern Society

My article is about Karl Marx's compelling account of human nature and modern society, comparing it to Max Weber and Emile Durkheim. Meanwhile, Durkheim believes that organic solidarity and division of labor are the main characteristics of modernity. Weber examines rationalization and disenchantment, and Marx offers an account focused on class struggle and social instability. We often think about whether the problems we face every day are the result of our inherent nature, or rather the environment we live in today. . The founding fathers, in a certain sense, asked themselves the question. Karl Marx focused his attention on how capitalism alienated humanity by making work a mere means of individual existence, while Max Weber focused his attention on how excessive rationalism suppressed freedom and intuition. Emile Durkheim managed this phenomenon for temporary pathologies. Their evaluations of modernity are linked to their beliefs about human nature. Emile Durkheim's vision of modern society is thought of as a high division of labor in which "organic solidarity" predominates. Roles and institutions act like organs in our body and depend on each other. When it comes to the State, for example, it regulates like the brain, obtaining reciprocal justice and solidarity on the body. This ensures that social inequality is based primarily on merit. In the state of moral and dynamic density, individualism and rationality are able to rise above “collective consciousness” and religion. However, for Durkheim, despite the great cohesion, there are many pathological phenomena, such as anomie and even some economic conflicts. However, these are only temporary. Emile Durkheim sees social and economic cohesion as a critical part of the... center of the paper... while Durkheim's individuals emerge as real individuals outside the economy, and for Marx we are all exploited by the notion of individuality. Therefore, with Marx and Durkheim, the human being is dependent and social on others. Weber thinks that individuals can survive separated from others and engage in social relationships only for particular reasons. According to the classical theorist, (2) “modern people experience three dehumanizing realities: anomie, alienation, and disenchantment. According to Durkheim, modern society conforms to human nature, but anomie remains a persistent problem or pathology. According to Marx, humanity is both alienated and on the verge of self-realization due to modern capitalism. Finally, at Weber we are now completely disenchanted with modern rationalization. Unlike Durkheim and Weber, Marx is capable of a convincing prognosis of the “modern condition”..”