One of the most famous sayings that we know and embody growing up is that worries are the greatest possession, they are family. “Family comes first, because in the end they are the ones who are always there.” For most this means doing everything we can to provide for and protect our loved ones. If you were in a situation, could you practice what you preach?! Society has guided us to believe that stealing is wrong, but when you follow in their footsteps, you might think otherwise. For each situation, moral theories are used to explain whether an action was right or wrong. In society it is described as wrong, but society never thinks about normal people and their lives. Society believes that stealing bread to feed a hungry family is wrong and immoral, as it considers the concept of theft, not the bigger picture. Normal people see it as a means of support since they are the ones who follow in the footsteps that are being walked. For this reason, stealing bread to feed your hungry family is moral. Two controversial theories that support the moral concept of right and wrong are ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism. As defined, ethical subjectivism is concerned with the attitudes of subjects and the proposition of what is true. In short, it's their feelings about their behavior. When one finds oneself in a situation, the afterthought of "it was right, I'm glad I did it" or the opposite, "it was wrong, I shouldn't have done it" is eliminated, since these are not thoughts but are a reflection on their thoughts but on their rational behavior and for this reason the third party complaint is rejected. This leaves room to argue that they are acting from a moral perspective, as it is clear in black and white why the act of stealing bread was committed... middle of paper... the concept of what we should do or what should we do. Ethics is planning to help people receive the life they desire and live it with purpose. In certain situations it is not clear whether to consider it moral or immoral since ethics comes into play together with morality. Some argue that the concept of what can be defined as moral is immoral along with ethics through feelings, religion, law, culture and science. Although they demonstrate a good position, they cannot be justified since such reasons are more of opinions that are modified daily depending on that of the individual. For this reason any act can be considered moral since we can use a descriptive education that depicts that of ethics, in which we live a life seeking how things should be and how this depends on the individual. So who's to say what's right and what's wrong? If it exists in the universe it can be moral.