Capital punishment does not automatically imply justice. I don't understand the benefit of implementing capital punishment in the U.S. In most cases, what is considered effective is a matter of comparing human error to error (mistakes are inevitable and humans are unpredictable). Defensively I disagree with the statement that it should apply to convicted murderers. It is an obvious fact that capital punishment has done more harm than good to society and human existence. Let's face it; In the United States, crime is at an all-time high. Despite the laws regulating crime in the USA, the occurrence of crimes continues to grow at an alarming rate (the stricter the laws become, the more crimes increase). As a result, this rapid growth in crimes has led to the wasting of more lives through capital punishment. Human beings are being executed with enormous potential within them and society is losing its tendency to grow economically. From an ethical perspective, the issue of capital punishment has generated much controversy regarding the government's role in the entire arrangement. I firmly believe that government involvement in the enforcement of capital punishment and other criminal laws must be controlled. The government politicizes criminal cases and shows many biases, errors and injustices in making judgments. The government tends to base judgment on race, class, or perhaps the most common reason for its action: “financial strength.” The more financially strong you are, the better your chances of finding a lawyer who will prove your case is right, even if the evidence is fabricated. Furthermore, the implementation of capital punishment leaves no room for a second change. No matter how inevitable mistakes are, they can be corrected and eradicated. Furthermore, the unpredictable nature of the human being that leads him to commit murder can make him unpredictably realize the gravity of his crime and possibly change his mentality..