The definition of democracy has varied throughout history. One of the most accepted interpretations comes from the Austrian-American economist Joseph Schumpeter. In his book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Schumpeter describes democracy as “an institutional device for arriving at political decisions that achieve the common good by having the people themselves decide matters through the election of individuals who must come together to bring about forward his will." (Schumpeter). The different models of democracy can be divided into two main pillars: presidential and parliamentary. Throughout their respective histories, the two forms have been widely debated regarding which one allows for a more efficient system or which one provides a more democratic process. Between the two forms of democratic government, parliamentary systems allow government to pass laws more quickly and efficiently and create better stability within the government and between political parties. Both capabilities give parliamentary systems an efficiency advantage. Parliamentary systems are also structured so that there is a clear relationship between the branches of government, thus building safety nets that can prevent political stalemates from derailing the government. Finally, parliamentary systems show their superior democratic capabilities with a broader division of powers and responsibilities through accountable government. It is also notable that both systems often use indirect elections, but there are cases in presidential systems where elections contradict the very principles of democracy. A parliamentary system is a democratic form of government in which the ruling party receives the most representation. . It means that the leader belongs naturally… half of the document… Oral University is Bad for America, George C. Edward III Says Lack of “One Person One Vote” Principle Contradicts the Very Nature of Political Equality and, ultimately, fails to represent a sufficient way to exercise democratic rights (Edward III). There is no consensus on whether parliamentary systems are ultimately better than presidential systems. But many political scholars have supported the thesis of parliamentary systems. The efficiency and smooth policy-making process demonstrated in parliaments, as well as the presence of an intrinsic and accountable relationship between the executive and legislative branches, give parliamentary systems an advantage in terms of effectiveness. Furthermore, the broader division of powers, the concept of accountable government in Britain and Canada, and the imperfect electoral college in the United States also give a democratic advantage to parliamentary systems..