For example, in episode 4, 25% of the expert readers recognized the idea, while none of the student readers were able to identify it. This shows that at the beginning of the study, already 25% of expert readers found the idea thanks to their knowledge and skills with rhetorical reading. This also supports the idea that students should be introduced to rhetorical reading to be able to effectively uncover hidden ideas like expert readers. Later in the experiment, in episode 7, all the expert readers were able to identify the idea while the student readers were still unable to understand it, and this continued until episode 8. In the experiment, the more experienced readers were able to understand the idea in each episode while the student readers had no idea what it was until episode 8. With all the studies and experiments, I believe this study is effective in demonstrating that reading rhetoric should be introduced to student readers. However, on the contrary, it could be argued that the experiments are ineffective because there is no evidence that a variety of ethnicities and regions exist, this could refute the data because they could have been rigged to include only a certain