Most upper-class high rollers usually started out as members of the working class. They had to demonstrate why they had to be such good members in running such a well-run establishment. And once they demonstrate that they will keep their promise, they promise. But sometimes we have things that prevent us from achieving that kind of status. Which brings me to body marking tattoos in the workplace. Most candidates trying to apply for high power jobs or maybe even middle class jobs have a hard time getting these positions because of these signs which may have a certain meaning of some kind. The employees' claims could have been coupled with religion (as in Reed's case); national origin (e.g., tattoos common to Polynesian cultures); gender, if policies were applied differently to men than women (e.g., women can wear earrings, but men can wear “gauges” that gradually lengthen the earlobe?); and even free speech in the case of a hospital nursing assistant who had a tattoo reading “HIV Positive” (Modern Healthcare, 1993, Bartley, 1999) which he said allowed him to talk about safe sex.” (Osland 2014 “There are so many flaws in our business society that any of this can be considered discrimination. Because who are we to say that a person's tattoo is not a right of his personal business. Personally I don't see any harm that it can lead to a working collaborator
tags