Examining Elliot Turiel and Albert Bandura's perspectives on how children develop a sense of right and wrong are fundamentally the same but not exactly equivalent. According to Bandura's moral enhancement hypothesis, "individuals are believed to abstract and integrate information encountered in a variety of social experiences, such as exposure to role models, verbal discussions, and disciplinary encounters." Children use these things to express their ethical progress. Following Bandura's hypothesis of good progress, it is essential to convey to the child a feeling of good and bad from a scriptural point of view. Without the proximity of the Bible in their lives at an early age, they may not have our Heavenly Father's patterns or verbal exchanges to use as a source of perspective when in their basic leadership process of what is good and bad. there is no vision, the people are unbridled but happy are those who observe the law". Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get an original essay The Turiel Hypothesis has the framework belief that ethical quality is concerned with harm, well-being and reasonableness Meanwhile, the child's mental, social and positive space pushes the child towards their own ethical quality social, for example, agreeableness (and therefore academic conduct). While Bandura's hypothesis expresses that children look to the people around them as models and copy that conduct and explore different avenues in that regard, adults can show ways in where they can place themselves in the situation of others and remember how they feel when they find themselves in a comparative circumstance. This is the thing that influenced me to identify with Bandura's social learning hypothesis. Both Elliot Turiel and Albert Bandura believed that ethical improvement begins at a young age. furthermore, within social improvement, there is a qualification between ethical quality and social tradition. Good and bad or good choices are based on the impact of others and how they feel; social tradition is decided and this must happen for society to cooperate. Elliot's exploration stops and Albert continues to expand. He believed that introducing young children to models, verbal discourse, and experiences of control will influence how they understand what is good and what is bad. It will also help decide how they react to environmental improvements and what kind of conditions they seek out for themselves. Since Jesus is our infinitely informed source, we must follow Him, His affirmation and His works. If our ethical progress begins at a young age, the sooner we begin to manifest ourselves according to Jesus, the better we will be able to understand what is good and what is bad. Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay I plan to use a lot of open instruction minutes in my classroom. Depending on the circumstances, have class dialogues and discussions to establish whether the activity was the correct one. Then give students a chance to talk about what would be a more suitable activity. Furthermore, I can help students develop a sense of right and wrong by showing good practices and praising my students when they do the same. I will have discussions about why we do certain things and how they affect others.