Why a careful and accurate analysis of the audience, purpose and context of a text is fundamental to successful technical communication ? How might different audiences, purposes, or contexts influence technical communication? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The key to any successful technical communication is the ability to generate adequate analysis of the audience, purpose, and context of the communication. It is the analysis of these factors that allows you to understand and generate presentations and documents within a given engineering context. This implies that without an accurate analysis of the context, audience and purpose of the communication, it is not possible to acquire essential skills to respond to various communication contexts and situations, thus rendering communication ineffective. Depending on the context, purpose and audience of any technical communication, several factors are bound to change to suit their understanding. For example, the choice of software, devices and services used in communication will be directly determined by the engineering context of technical communication. Furthermore, the diction will be strongly determined by the audience and the engineering context. During the Design4Practice program, my work was primarily aimed at my fellow students, and the audience may change slightly in EGR 386w to include key engineering stakeholders who may be interested in the program. Technical communicators (e.g., engineers) often struggle to be adequately clear, concise, and complete in their writing/communication. Why might this balance be difficult to achieve? Have you struggled with this balance before? Most technical communicators often find it difficult to find the balance between thoroughness, clarity and conciseness in their communication due to the nature of the work they deal with. Taking the engineering context as an example, most of the work here is highly detailed and comprehensive, so much so that their expression requires in-depth work. In attempting to achieve this understanding, most technical communicators find themselves drifting away from the clear and concise aspects of communication. On the other hand, when they opt for more clarity and conciseness, the result is always minimal detail in their work, thus making it very difficult to find the balance between clarity, understanding and conciseness of their work. I personally have not experienced such situations. Describe the importance of ethical technical communication, particularly in EGR 386w. What are some ways in which technical communication might be considered unethical, and why should this concern engineers (and stakeholders)? Ethical technical communication ensures that engineers demonstrate their ability to undertake engineering work accurately, without bias and honestly. It also ensures that engineers only sign up for engineering jobs that they can competently undertake without any effort, thus ensuring that the quality of work they deliver is top-notch. Technical communication can be considered unethical when the technical communicator fails to indicate authorship and indicate citations about his/her work and when the work performed in no way contributes to the betterment of society one way or the other. Such cases should be of great concern to engineers as they can compromise the quality of engineering work and success .