The term political socialization was coined in 1959 by an American professor of sociology, Herbert H. Hyman as "learning social patterns corresponding to one's social positions mediated through various agents of society " (1959, p.25). This essay is a personal reflection on my political socialization through my "agents of socialization", namely my parents and the trade union leader Jeremy Corbyn as part of the political organization Momentum. A Sears quote describes socialization as “society's molding of the child” (1975, p. 95). My goal is to use Dennis Kavanugh's framework of opposing concepts of primacy and actuality to explore this socialization and how these socializations have "shaped" my views and made me who I am today. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay My family, as primary agents of my childhood socialization, as per most played an important role in my political socialization, although probably unconsciously part; I grew up in a family that was never involved in politics. We never watched the news, we weren't religious, we had a middle income, and we were white. Politically neutral. It can be said that, although I grew up without explicit political discussions in the family, the combination of everything my parents taught me, the values ​​they passed on to me and the cultural capital associated with belonging to a particular social class formed the basis of what would become my political ideology. Having the childhood I experienced means possessing forms of cultural capital and acquiring certain values ​​that can be beneficial in particular areas of life (education system, job market, etc.). The idea of ​​this "cultural capital" that I mentioned was conceived by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu who defined it as a "familiarity with legitimate culture within a society" (1979) and considering that I am against I use the term "legitimate culture" as I believe it implies that cultures outside of the middle class are illegitimate. I find it can be applied in most socialization comparisons. Cultural capitals are essentially a set of social goods that can promote social mobility beyond economic means, although they are indisputably linked to a family's financial capital; Unfortunately, “poor children, through no fault of their own, are less prepared by their families, their schools, and their communities to develop their God-given talents as fully as rich children” (Putman, 2015, p. 230). they include things like education, intellect, vocabulary and speaking style (accent), clothing, and even physical appearance. They are most commonly acquired during childhood and, perhaps most relevantly, are often passed on to children by their parents and/or their primary socialization agents. Kavanaugh's primacy theory can easily be applied to my childhood experience; that the influence you receive at this early age (explicitly political or otherwise) is shaping your young mind and imparting values ​​that may later align with a certain political ideology. Ben Rosamund expresses well the feeling that “the kinds of values ​​that are ingrained in the early stages of childhood 'come into play' during later life” (Axford et al, 2002, p.67). The implication here is that this stage of your life is the most important and will stay with a child for their entire life. I don't agree with this school of.59).