I believe the conflict in Syria violates just war theory. Just War rules include the human right not to be killed or tortured, and also that other countries must intervene during mass killings and genocides. People are being stripped of their human rights, and intervention by the United States and other countries has done little or nothing to help. Maybe it even made things worse. I've heard a lot about it since last summer, especially about Aleppo. I wanted to understand why it all started, so I found an article on the BBC titled “Why is there war in Syria?” from December 2016 to learn how all this started. I also read the articles “Executions in Syria: Has Assad's government implemented a 'policy of extermination'?” from the Christian Science Monitor and “Amnesty Report Accuses Syria of Executing Thousands Since War Began” from the New York Times, because these were more recent articles from about a week ago, regarding the genocide of citizens Syrians by their own government. Say no to plagiarism. . Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Many Syrians were angered by unemployment and political corruption under President Bashar al-Assad, who succeeded his father in 2000. Then, in 2011, the Syrian government used deadly force against pro-democracy protesters in Deraa . This is a violation of human rights, which are part of the Just War. The protesters were not attacking people less powerful than them and were killed due to government force. The protests spread, people began to arm themselves and soon the real civil war we know today broke out. The intervention of other countries made the war last longer. Because there have been so many human rights violations, other intervening countries would not violate just war theory, but would adapt to it, with obligations not to attack unless someone else attacked first, otherwise rights humans would not have been violated. Jihadist groups have gained more power in Syria due to its weakened state due to the war. IS groups are fighting not only the Syrian government, but also rebels against the Syrian government and Kurdish groups. One of the things the United States did was airstrikes against jihadists. I think this is acceptable under just war theory if it only kills jihadists. However, these can also eliminate innocent civilians, which would violate just war theory. The United States has armed moderate rebels, taking care to ensure that weapons are not transferred from rebels to jihadists. I think this fits with just war theory, because this way the rebels can help overthrow the corrupt government. However, some of these weapons are destined to end up in the hands of jihadists, because many have allied themselves with the rebels. The only way to really prevent this from happening is to send our troops to fight the jihadists and bring down the corrupt Syrian government. However, we would lose our people, as well as a lot of money and resources. I think it might be a violation of just war theory not to interfere directly in Syria, where the government is committing genocide. It is similar to the Clinton administration's refusal to intervene in Rwanda in the 1990s. We have tried to do something to help the Syrians, but in reality it is not enough, because they are still dying. Therefore, intervening when genocide is committed violates the Just War and UN agreements. Amnesty International recently found in a report that up to 13,000 prisoners,.