Topic > Nicholas Kristoff's analysis of the connection between the Syrian migrant problem and Jewish annihilation as illustrated in his New York Times article, Anne Frank Today is a Syrian Girl

New York Times editorial columnist and author, Nicholas Kristoff , article “Anne Frank Today is a Syrian Girl” argues how the Syrian refugee crisis is similar to the Holocaust. He writes about the American reaction to both the crisis and the lack of empathy and resources for refugees. Kristoff uses a cutting tone to allow the reader to understand the past and present in their hostility towards refugees. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The article begins with the reader showing the photo of Anne Frank and a damn Syrian girl after an airstrike in Syria side by side. Kristoff uses pathos for the reader to feel emotion. However, on the right Anne Frank is seen well dressed, while on the left the image shows a crying girl with a disheveled appearance and blood everywhere. Both girls faced hostility in their home countries and were unable to come to America for a better life. Kristoff begins with the perspective of Otto Frank attempting to escape Germany by obtaining visas for his family. Unfortunately, global indifference cost his sons assassination in Nazi Germany. The United States indirectly murdered them because it turned a blind eye to the Holocaust. Kristoff asks, “Sound familiar?” in which he refers to the Syrian refugee crisis and that history seems to repeat itself, with regard to refugees trying to escape persecution. The kairos of this article is timely, as the United States reiterates its paranoia about meeting Syrians who are entering the country in large numbers. Kristoff said Obama has promised to increase the number of Syrian refugees entering the United States. However, fears of terrorism prevent Syrian refugees from seeking asylum in the United States. Readers feel emotion or pathos when they read about the uncertainty that Syrian and Jewish families have in terms of public opinion. Kristoff uses facts or logos while defending the claim that Jewish families were not wanted. An advisor to the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam said a family does not want to hide in the heart of Nazi occupation unless they have no choice. Kristoff uses ethics when he states that he was the son of Jewish refugees when he entered the United States during World War II. He relates directly to the current Syrian refugee crisis because he understands what it means to escape danger. She points out that even though Anne Frank and her family knew English and had an American network, they thought the transition would be better. However, Kristoff purposely uses logos when he includes a survey about what the American people thought of Jewish refugees and their concerns outweighed their sympathies. Kristoff strategically uses the logos of the New York Chamber of Commerce in 1934 commenting that if the United States continues to welcome refugees then it will gain a reputation for being a poor home or asylum. This shows that the US government did not value human life and was more concerned with profits. Refugees were seen as the deficit of the United States and as an invisible enemy. Kristoff deliberately italicised readers' comments about how Jewish refugees were not as dangerous as Syrian refugees; “But the Jews were not as much of a threat as the Syrian refugees are!” Kristoff sees the irony of this statement showing that the refugees were the enemy and repeats this.