Index IntroductionAdvantages/Disadvantages of Different Leadership/Management StylesConclusionReferencesIntroductionIn this essay I will discuss the following; leadership and management, advantages and disadvantages of leadership and management styles, the characteristics of a good leader and the differences between mentoring, coaching, project management and learning organisation. I will also express my opinion on the leadership vs management debate. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Difference Between Leadership and Management: The main difference between leadership and management is as follows: Leadership is the virtue of leading people by encouraging them. Management is a process of managing the organization's activities. Leadership requires followers' trust in its leader. Unlike Management, which requires the manager's control over his subordinates. Leadership is the ability to influence others while Management is the quality of those who govern. Leadership requires the leader's foresight, but Management has a short-range vision. In leadership, principles and guidelines are established, while, in the case of management, policies and procedures are implemented. Leadership is proactive. In contrast, management is reactive in nature. Leadership brings change. On the other hand, management brings stability. Advantages/Disadvantages of Different Leadership/Management Styles Autocratic or Authoritarian An autocratic or authoritarian leadership style will include dictates and orders such as telling assistants what needs to be done and how something should be done. This form is useful when time is short, the leader has all the information needed to complete a task, and his workforce is well motivated. However, the authoritarian style is bad when the leader could profit from or take advantage of the ideas of others. In fact, neglecting information from intelligent and responsible subordinates can prove counterproductive in any situation. Democratic or Participatory A leader's democratic or participatory approach to his employees' problem-solving ideas. It tends to involve its workforce in the overall decision-making process. A leader is a supreme authority in all matters, however, his tendency to engage his workforce not only provides the leader with ideas he might not have had, but also instills in his workforce a sense of confidence, purpose and value . The participative leader also receives love and respect from his subordinates because he has the strength to be collaborative instead of being isolated and controlling. However, this leadership style is not appropriate when time is short and the problem needs to be resolved immediately. Laissez-faire or delegated leader The laissez-faire or delegated leader leaves the task together with the means to achieve it entirely at his expense. workers. Although leaders remain responsible for task completion, decision making and problem solving are delegated to subordinates. This leadership style is highly dependent on a well-motivated and skilled workforce that knows how to get things done. This form is based on the concept that a leader is not able to do everything and therefore sometimes must delegate tasks. But this style is not suitable when the workforce is inexperienced or unskilled and when the leader has all the required information and the task needs to be completed immediately. So, in the real world of business, leaders need to address different circumstances with the right leadership style. and approach. One style may not be the most convenient. However, a good leader must be able to change style depending on the=8