September 11, 2001 was a tragic day for the entire nation. We have all suffered in different ways; whether it was addressed on national television, spoken through music, or written for others to read. We were all intrigued to hear what others had to say about what happened and their perspectives. Nothing could make it better than talking about it, as reflected in Toby Keith's “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue,” Bruce Springsteen's “My City Ruins,” The Onion's American Life Turns Into Bad Jerry Bruckheimer Movie, and The Monologue by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. Each of these reflected on what happened on 9/11 in different ways. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay I think the least effective sources were the two songs by Toby Keith and Bruce Springsteen. They explained how terrible the explosion scene was and the patriotism that America now needs. The reason I didn't like them was because a lot of the songs weren't written by the artists themselves. They might have had a role in the writing of the film, but it wasn't just them. Furthermore, Bruce Springsteen's song was not originally written for the terrorist attack. It was written for his hometown, but before they published it the attacks happened, so they changed it to link it to the Twin Towers. I didn't think it was authentic, that's why I didn't like it. My reason for not thinking Toby Keith's song was effective is because it wasn't just about 9/11; it particularly concerned his father. I thought maybe there should be one just about his father and then another just for 9/11. This is because he made this song to perform for the Marines. I thought the focus should be on them for this song. My personal opinion is that he should have created two separate songs for these two incidents because they are of equal importance. The Onions article was satirical in addressing such a serious issue. I know it's a sarcastic website, but there needs to be a level of respect. He likened every part of the attack to a movie, and I think that was the weak point. It had serious parts that were explained by talking about movies, but I didn't think it was necessary. There was no need to compare presidents to actors. For me the most effective part was when they talked about these events that happened in the movies, but now it's not for entertainment, in fact it's not funny at all. This compared what happened to what happens in movies, but still had a serious tone. The most effective source that reacted to 9/11 was Jon Stewart's monologue. That's because he's a host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central. This network aims to make people laugh. He cracked a joke or two, but other than those few seconds he remained serious for the entire nine minutes. This shows how tragic the situation was when a comedian was crying due to mourning the attacks on the Twin Towers. He said "the reason I don't despair is because this attack is not a dream, but after all, the recovery is a dream realized." What happened was real and Jon Stewart made it clear that there is a time to be funny and a time to be serious, which is why I thought this was the most effective piece. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom article piece now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay The terrorist attacks in New York City were devastating to the entire nation. Emotions were let out in many ways, but I think being sarcastic about an event like this is not the way to go. I also think that attention.