Topic > Analysis of Gay Marriage from a Social Science Perspective

Gay marriage, even when it was legalized on June 26, 2015, is still a controversial topic that has often been contested in recent years. In this discussion there are two sides: those who oppose gay marriage and those who support it. Those who support gay marriage raise issues of discrimination, persecution and freedom of expression. Illegalizing the act of gay marriage, as they argue, would be an act of discrimination against the homosexual community, hindering their expression of love through marriage. This would seem no better than the persecution that gay men and women faced in the society's early years. Those who oppose gay marriage usually raise the concept of religion, protesting that the legalization of gay marriage goes against religiously based moral values, is ungodly, and how homosexuality itself does not respect the laws of nature. However, another common concept of evidence used is that of social science and how gay marriage will affect the masses and future generations. This topic is quite diverse and extends to different situations, so before delving into this concept, the only thing that needs to be understood is sexual orientation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe definition of sexual orientation refers to sexual, emotional, and/or romantic attraction to the sex(s), as well as the behavior and attractions that follow. This conveys the idea that environmental factors can influence and even determine a person's sexual orientation, along with the concept that sexual orientation and homosexuality can also be determined genetically. After years of studies it has been confirmed that the "gay gene" exists. The genes are found on chromosomes 13 and 14, affecting the hypothalamus and thyroid. The thyroid gene, TSHR, influences the control of thyroid function, causing it to function excessively, while the gene that affects the hypothalamus, SLTRK6, determines the interconnection between neuroanatomical molecularity and sexual orientation. It has not yet been proven that environmental factors, in addition to the probable influence of education, influence the sexual orientation of children, but it is assumed and is still being studied. Mainly, the main reason why gay marriage is so problematic is the difference in religious beliefs. Homosexuality is something that has always been looked down upon for decades, even centuries. As time went on, homosexuality began to be more and more embraced and recognized in the public eye. They began to fight for equal rights and with that came the right to marry someone of the same sex. Christians and Catholics, along with many other faiths, believe in marriage between one man and one woman. It is believed that God placed men and women on Earth to be one, as shown in the famous biblical story of Adam and Eve. The actively religious population firmly supports these views, which are completely legal under the First Amendment. This is where the approval of gay marriage became problematic; the public was divided into two morally different camps and neither would have been happy if the decision had not been their initial verdict. Morality seemed to be the basis of each side, as each side had a different understanding of right and wrong on this matter. Social science was then introduced as evidence for both sides, each creating a more solid basis for their opinions, touching on topics such as infidelity, gender roles, and the effect on children and future generations. There are someideas in the social sciences that those who oppose gay marriage exploit to their advantage. Of these statements, many concern the future generation and the education of children, with the most important being the need for mothers and fathers to have homosexual relationships. Mothers provide emotional stability, as well as physical understanding and familiarity towards girls, which will be missing in a relationship between two males. Fathers reduce hypersexual activity in girls and antisocial behavior in boys, while providing an example of how men should act and treat women. Without these influences, it is said that girls will participate in sexual acts at an earlier age, including teenage pregnancy, and boys will become unruly and antisocial. This leads to the topic of gender roles and the inadequacy of same-sex parenting. It is claimed that the “small difference” between children raised by heterosexual couples and same-sex couples is preliminary due to the conjecture that most studies are done by supporters of same-sex marriage. The evidence from such studies may have been downplayed and therefore distorted to accommodate the main judgment. Regarding gender roles, it is stated that marriage thrives based on the gender roles of men and women being fulfilled, demonstrating the separation of responsibilities in marriage. Males, as has been the case for centuries, are destined to be the workers of the family. They are destined to earn the family income, becoming the backbone of the family. Women should play the role of mothers, taking care of household chores and maintenance. When these “requirements” are met, married men are shown to be less likely to be sexually unfaithful and to become domesticated as their testosterone levels decline. Not only that, but married heterosexual men are also shown to work harder and earn more financially. Same-sex couples, particularly between men, are not natural, so they do not domesticate men, leading them to be less committed and more prone to infidelity. Social science can also be a boon to supporters of gay marriage, too. District courts have held that stability between the two parents, more than sex or gender, ensures the child's well-being. A child's well-being is more influenced by situations and emotions than by the gender and sexual orientation of the people who care for him or her, as long as the family is economically and socially healthy and the child feels a sense of security and adequacy. Sexual orientation and partner choice, however, can cause a lack of opportunities for the same-sex couple, which can cause stress and tension within the family, affecting the well-being of not only the couple, but also the child. When opting for adoption, parental custody, or reproductive assistance, couples cannot be denied because of gender or sexual orientation, but rather are judged on their economic and social competence, as well as their ability to take proper care of the child. Marriage is used as a mechanism to strengthen relationships and families and this is no different for same-sex couples, and the deprivation of marriage is what can actually harm the well-being of the child. To refer to gender and parental roles, they are exactly what they say. Roles that can be played by any gender for sex. Studies have shown that even fathers can play the maternal role when the mother figure is absent and the child can be as healthy and happy as he would have been..