The Hae Min Lee Murder Case is a very intriguing incident, as it is a story full of many holes and facts that don't match up. For observers and investigators alike, this is a difficult case to consider, as there is evidence that can support any number of claims. The main fact of this case is that on January 13, 1999, 17-year-old Hae Min Lee was killed and buried in a forest called Leakin Park. In the trial, the prosecution focused on Adnan Syed, Hae's ex-boyfriend, and the jury was quick to find him guilty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssaySerial is a podcast narrated by Sarah Koenig that creates entertainment in the form of investigative journalism. The podcast focused on this particular case to uncover the truth behind the events that led to Hae Min Lee's death, but the facts that have come to light have led to many debates developing, with a major portion thinking that Adnan is guilty , and the other The other party believes he is innocent. Personally, this podcast has caused me to change my opinion on the case several times. Listening to the testimonies of those who knew Adnan in the first episode and the way Koenig presented the evidence during the podcast convinced me that Adnan was innocent. However, listening to the last episode, where Koenig started to doubt Adnan's innocence, made me change my opinion and think that Adnan is guilty. Since the first episode, Adnan has always insisted that his relationship and eventual breakup with Hae Min Lee was amicable. Other people have also supported this claim. However, Hae's diary tells a different story. Hae's diary entries contained valuable information that suggested Adnan wasn't taking the breakup too well, and she felt threatened by his behavior, with one entry even stating that Hae had asked teachers to keep her away from Syed. This does not seem like the usual behavior of those who have “moved on,” as Adnan would have you believe. There was also a handwritten separation letter that Hae had sent to Adnan in November 1998, two months before her murder. The contents of the note were quite similar to what most parting notes would contain, however, the most significant aspect of the letter is what Syed scribbles at the top of the letter, saying "I intend to kill." This shows that Adnan's anger level was not normal, even though he said he had overcome it. This level of anger is pretty strange even for a teenager, especially one who said he wasn't unusually upset by the breakup; the aggressive tone is a stark contrast to the persona Koenig initially presented in the first episode. The phrase “I'm going to kill” has a strong verbal use to suggest that the action will take place, making Hae's case more suspicious since she was killed two months later. While it may not be biological evidence, the letter Syed receives and Hae's diary entries are physical evidence that cast suspicion on Syed and his involvement in the murder. The next damning piece of evidence is Jay's testimony. Jay was one of Adnan's best friends and they knew each other very well. During police testimony, when Jay was interviewed, he was very reluctant to provide information. Due to his uncooperative behavior, the police had to put a lot of pressure on Jay to give his testimony. And when Jay started, he didn't stop; suddenly, Jay started providing information with a great quality ofdetail. The podcast made it seem like Jay was lying because he was initially unsure about providing information and then somehow managed to recite an entire story. I also thought Jay was lying and thought it ridiculous that the police based the entire case on Jay's testimony. However, if Jay had remained on the spot, it would have been very difficult for him unless he had rehearsed everything beforehand. It's not every day that a teenager can come up with such an elaborate and detailed outline so easily. The other question on my mind as I listened to Jay's testimony was motive: Why would Jay lie about the murder and "frame" his friend if Syed was actually innocent? Jay's initial reluctance can be attributed to his fear that he might get in trouble for being complicit. When he realized he wouldn't be charged, he was able to tell the truth. What I found most disconcerting about this case was that Adnan had no memory of the day Hae was found missing. I would have thought that his previous relationship with her would have meant that the details of that day would have been clearer to him. However, this was not the case. While I can understand that people forget unimportant details, it has been shown that when a significant event occurs, people are able to remember better. What could be more significant than the disappearance of the girl Adnan claimed to have once loved? There was also no evidence that he had attempted to contact her when he discovered she was missing. This lack of concern on his part and the convenience of his memorylessness increased the doubts in my mind about his innocence. “Nisha calling” is a very important factor to consider in this investigation. The “Nisha call” refers to call logs that show someone called a girl named Nisha with Adnan's phone an hour after Hae Min Lee's murder. While it may be an obvious conclusion that the caller was Adnan, he claims to have left the phone in Jay's car during this period. The call lasted for two minutes and Adnan suggested that Jay could pocket call Nisha. Jay, who didn't know Nisha, countered that Adnan had called Nisha while she was in his car. Koenig, the narrator, admits that "Nisha's call is the one that has always struck me and I think most people who have looked at Adnan's case closely because it happens on the afternoon that Hae disappeared at a time when Adnan said , he even insisted he wasn't with the phone, that Jay had the phone while he was at school.” Adnan's pocket dial explanation is a possibility but, in my opinion, it seems more like a ridiculous excuse than Jay would put Adnan's phone in his pocket for any reason. It is more likely that Adnan dialed Nisha's phone number himself and is trying to find an excuse to hide it. Keep in mind: this is just one example. Get a document now customized by our expert writers. Get a custom essay The podcast Serial evidence skillfully presented to support or refute Adnan's claim of innocence Although there was compelling evidence for both sides, I believe the arguments supporting Adnan's guilt were stronger and more in line with my beliefs. This may be in direct opposition to what Koenig, the narrator, wanted listeners to think, but in the end, it is important to remember that this podcast was focused on entertaining the audience and presenting information in an unbiased manner to allow listeners to draw your own conclusions. Works Cited Koenig, S. (Producer)..