False accusations: Edward Snowden The government of the United States of America has a crucial task: to protect its citizens and their rights. Violating rules strictly established by the Constitution is considered illegal and clearly unconstitutional. Edward Snowden, a young genius, was working for the CIA when he got into trouble. Snowden stole classified information attempting to expose U.S. alliances around the world, such as the NSA. This association was founded to protect the United States and its citizens; they have the ability to tap into private information but only for extreme problems. Snowden thought he was doing what was right by exposing this association, however, everything the NSA does is considered constitutional. By doing this and aiding America's adversaries, Snowden technically created the exact definition of treason [1] . Regardless of whether or not some of Snowden's revelations had any merit, he betrayed the United States and became a traitor, ultimately leaving his country in danger. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay By betraying organizations that are trying to protect Americans with invalid assumptions, Snowden put all of his fellow citizens in danger. Marc Thiessen of the Washington Post states that: "The discovery of the PRISM program under which the NSA monitors foreign terrorists on the Internet, as well as the leak of a top-secret court order requiring Verizon to share call data with the government, are incredibly harmful to national security. These leaks give terrorists information they didn't have about our collection activities” (Theissen) leaked vital information about the U.S. government be monitored in the United States, which will ultimately lead them to devise a new strategy to avoid being listened to and observed. Since Snowden leaked this information, the government's job of protecting its citizens has become much more difficult, leaving citizens even more in danger. Edward Snowden formed his opinion against the NSA, declaring that what they did was unconstitutional because people have the right to privacy. However, what Snowden failed to understand is that the government has access to this vital information simply for the protection of the people; this is constitutional. The NSA had unknown access to phone bills from many different carriers, which may seem unconstitutional as an invasion of privacy, but is constitutional because they are only used in emergencies to protect the country. The government is not obliged to tell the people everything, otherwise the country could be put at risk. There have been secret court cases that allowed the NSA to have access to phone bills and more, but if people knew about it, there could be a rebellion over the thought that the government might be spying. It is simply human nature to think that everything done is to deny us. Snowden learned of what the NSA was doing and leaked crucial information trying to show fellow citizens that the government wasn't telling us everything. Snowden's act of disclosing this information is considered a violation of the Third Amendment: the right to privacy.[2] Although he thought he was highlighting the government's flaws, in the end he was doing the wrong thing himself and demonstrating the government's safety. Because of this leak, US citizens have a false understanding of how the government is protecting theirs.