The false dilemma is the only type of fallacy I vividly remember being the victim of. This with the intention of convincing my judgement. The false dilemma is a type of false fallacy, which involves reducing an argument into one or two options when multiple options exist. To achieve a particular level of persuasion, the options provided in case of a false dilemma do not go to the extremes of the issue. This makes him credible, thus proving accurate in the act of persuading someone. It is also important to note that options are drawn from a spectrum of possibilities. The presentation of the false choice is a deliberate action aimed at eliminating further actions that could neutralize the problem and return it to a middle ground. It is therefore likely that such an experience will damage the victim in subsequent realizations. However, it is possible to identify, overcome and weaken a mistake. This can be achieved by exploring and considering other possibilities. Such an act leaves little chance of a dilemma occurring, as knowledge is considered the most powerful solution. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In one case, the false dilemma fallacy regarding drugs was applied to me. The specific topic of discussion was the use of marijuana and why it was illegal in most nations. I remember my neighbor convincing me that marijuana is involved in the serious effects of mental illness and should not be condoned in any way. This has created a negative perception towards the drug and its users. Every time I hooked up with a friend and then realized that they were abusing the drug, I would consider it irresponsible and end the relationship with immediate effect. Little did I know that while it is a logical fact that marijuana abuse is harmful, it was all a fallacy that the drug had no benefits. After attending specific courses, I realized that the drug has medicinal purposes and states that recognize it as less harmful have even legalized its use. My neighbor and friend made me follow his attitude towards the drug by simply omitting some facts regarding this topic and providing me with the planned ideas I needed to hear to gain a similar perspective. The decision not to abuse or abuse marijuana could have been made without having to deceive myself. While not much has changed, I was surprised to realize that this information had been kept from me. The mistake worked mainly because my neighbor managed to evoke an attitude that I would not have maintained if full details had been provided. The fact that I still remember this childish act means that it was a successful deceptive act, the results of which had a substantial impact. The worst thing that has happened is my hatred and negative judgment towards anyone or any nation that has discussed the legalization of marijuana. Furthermore, I developed resentment towards my friends whenever they dared to show any kind of support towards the drug. The story of the therapeutic power of marijuana has humbled me and corrected my attitude, even if my moral principles remain valid. This error would be addressed if you had more in-depth knowledge of the drug.