Lobster is one of my most beloved seafood dishes for its delicate meat and rich flavor, however, after reading this article I have changed my mind." Consider the Lobster" by David Foster Wallace is a controversial article on whether or not it is humane to drop a live lobster into a pot of boiling water. It raised the question of whether it is okay to boil a live lobster just for your own desire, which is quite inspiring.Therefore, he had convinced me of his views on logos, ethos and pathos. I believe Wallace uses the description to deliberate on the meaning of pain to convince and win my heart, he includes definitions on taxonomic terms and references to demonstrate. his point as he compares and contrasts different points of view on this specific topic In order for Wallace to get his point across, in the first paragraph he described what the Main Lobster Festival was, he expressed it in the first person, which. it allowed me to see things from his perspective and understand how he felt about this topic. plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In the article, it is evident that Wallace tends to show pathos more, where he includes footnotes and endnotes that express his opinion and position on a topic precise segment of the article that allows him to introduce a new prospect. To get his point across he uses many rhetorical strategies that I myself had to contemplate. His strategies made me think about many other points of view such as that of lobsters, chefs and meat lovers. Wallace captures the use of pathos in a way that would be very convincing as he compares and contrasts lobsters to humans. He drew me in when he stated, “The lobster sometimes clings to the sides of the container or even hooks its claw on the edge of the kettle like a person trying to keep from falling over the edge of the roof. Giving me a sense of lobster remorse as if I were the creature placed in a pot of boiling water. Also, compare the Main Lobster Festival to the Nebraska Beef Festival. recounts some of the celebrations, but the one he emphasized the most was "watching the trucks pull up and the live cattle come down the ramp and slaughtered right there" looking at that image in my head I naturally had a tendency to feel guilty, which was Wallace's main point as to why is that you feel bad for the cattle, but not for the lobster, there's no difference in my eyes. Furthermore, it was then that Wallace introduced me to the ethical aspect of the topic where he convinced me that it is, in fact, inhumane to boil a lobster alive when he stated, "It's hard not to sense that they're unhappy or scared." . , even if it is a rudimentary version of these feelings,” demonstrating that we should not judge and treat the lobster better or worse based on the level of pain it feels. His perspective made me consider lobster more precisely based on that consideration. However, Wallace raises the argument that one might think they have the right to eat a lobster because they are not human. Wallace demonstrates this theory that people defend this assumption. At the Main Lobster Festival a "Lobster IQ Test" was conducted which stated that lobsters have a simple nervous system like that of a worm or grasshopper. He explained a particular case in which he questioned a man named Dick, whose son-in-law is a professional lobsterman and one of the Main Eating Tent's regular vendors, who claims that lobsters are simply just a large marine insect and continues,.