Globalization and the continued growth of relations between countries have led to an expansion and development of foreign policy. At the heart of all forms of interaction between sovereign states is the set of rules and guidelines that each of these countries applies to help achieve its individual objectives of national interest regarding the political, social and economic well-being of its citizens. As such, foreign policy continually gains dominance and importance in determining how a state grows as an actor in international affairs. In recent times, the social and economic progress of any state is highly dependent on the foreign policies it adopts regarding trade, industry, finance, political ideology or technology. Indeed, foreign policy has grown to the point that it is now a key campaign issue that democracies consider “very important” when choosing a leader in their presidential campaigns. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Foreign policy is an important set of adopted principles, activities, and key elements developed by communities to help them adapt and survive the evolving behavior of fellow states. Discipline is fundamental to the leadership of a State engaged in its activities in the international community. Foreign policy outlines how decisions are made, the steps and approaches a nation follows to ensure self-national individual interest in matters that concern international issues. Foreign policy outlines its goals and objectives that are of its national interest and establishes strategies to secure them through the exercise of its sovereign power. In theoretical terms, it translates the goals that a nation conceives, the interests it has, and a clear course of action that the state takes to achieve these predetermined goals and further preserve its interests in the occurrence of competitive behavior by other countries. In secular terms, foreign policy is a nation's shield in protecting its interests in all matters and aspects that create the prosperity of a sovereign state. It should usually be well thought out by the players to ensure that it helps them achieve a nation's goals (Dr. Mohinder Kumar). Foreign policy aims to guide objectives, actualize strategies or implement measures that a state adopts in its relations with international partners. It defines the approach that a state takes on various issues of international relations. In particular, foreign policy is the discipline that helps a country's diplomatic envoys and contributions with partners. It should start with a thorough understanding of the national and international political context. The national environment has an enormous influence on a state's foreign policy (Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics, Kenneth Waltz) and especially on a country's political ideologies and systems of government. . He compares the American presidential system and the British parliamentary system where he argues that the former is superior to the latter. This thesis statement has been covered extensively by Waltz throughout the text through which he has heavily used it as a tool to justify the underlying claim of the book that the American system is more superior to the British one. The use of party discipline in the British system to control the prime minister minimizes his space to independently and effectively address foreign policy. He faces the challenge of being overly cautious on potentially threatening issuesparty cohesion, which is the tool it uses to gain the power to guide foreign policy towards implementation. The American presidential system has a certain degree of fluidity that allows the president the opportunity to manage foreign policy with a better response that involves Congress in an objective manner. He concludes that government is praised when nations are great. Compared to the Soviet Union and the American system, the book Political Power: USA/USSR explores foreign policy using the capitalist and communist perspective. Zbigniew Brenski and Samuel Huntington closely compare and contrast the two different political ideologies of these two countries and how they influence foreign policy. Other domestic factors such as civil rights, consumer demands, governance structure, and industrial policies play a huge role in the direction a state's foreign policy takes. These two countries are used as a case study in this paper and the authors examine in detail the significance of domestic affairs in shaping a country's foreign policy. Foreign policy presents various options to a state in the various directions or approaches a country can follow. Following these options, apply some steps starting with initiation. A state evaluates both the local and international environments in a context that ensures in-depth understanding. It gives the state the options it has in a specific issue, for example trade policy, international hostility or industrial policy. In theory and practice, foreign policy broadly covers all issues relating to how the state as an actor in international affairs behaves. on its activity in line with the multiple objectives that a State has set itself and intends to achieve during a given period associated with a given political system. Given the nature of foreign policy, objectives may conflict and the state may be forced to implement them by reference to their priority. A country's interests are directly linked to its social, economic and political well-being. It is important for a State to determine and review the options available to it and make an assessment of the impact each outcome has on its national interests. The ability to implement a decision effectively to obtain the desired results is an objective that is carefully evaluated when a State evaluates whether or not to adopt a certain approach. The State has the power to implement these decisions at various levels of government both individually and through IGOs, Transnational Organizations, Third Sector. Primarily, most democracies and systems of government push their foreign policy agendas through the executive arm of their government structures. These actors are the central parties of international politics because they are the ones actively involved up to the execution stages. They are responsible for communicating decisions, engaging diplomatic means through which foreign policy is implemented. The institution acts independently but can involve legislative bodies or Congress in sensitive matters. The role to be played is the exclusive responsibility of the ministry usually in charge of foreign affairs or state affairs in collaboration with the departments with which foreign policy interacts. Once the implementer of foreign policy makes a decision about the path a state should take to determine whether it will be successful or not. The complexity of states as political organizations presents a network of subnational actors in the foreign policy arena and usually many times these domestic actors possess a dominant share of influence on their international behavior. ManyDemocracies exercise their sovereignty through elected representatives in leadership, legislative councils, interest groups, and the public. Collectively they produce the ideals that underpin their commitment to global issues. All these are packaged in cases where a state is strongly independent and its internal affairs are not compromised. Recently, trade deficits in America and China have been part of the contextual issues in presidential debates. In pursuing the national interests of the State, foreign policy is the instrument that serves to realize the ideals established to help a nation fulfill its obligations and as such must maintain a clear reflection on the values ​​and principles that a State supports. As a policy national, helps foreign policy makers understand the objectives and formulation of the images, attitudes, perceptions and beliefs that a state aims to demonstrate to its international actors. There are several factors that influence the choice of political goals and objectives. Richard C. Sneider, H. W. Bruck, and Burton Sapinn (1962), explicate the range of factors that influence choice using a concept they called "situation definition." Despite the wide range of elements shaping foreign policy, it can be argued that traditional factors are slowly losing their influence in emerging contemporary foreign relations which are intensifying due to widespread globalization highly possible in wave of high levels of technology of communication The personality and character of the leaders in charge of formulating policies, the general state of the international environment, the types of governance systems, and the ability to implement these policies are some of the traditional factors that shape these policies. Globalization is slowly shifting the role that the overall structure of international systems In recent times, there is a tendency to State foreign policy will be influenced primarily by international actors or climate. In a sense, the degree of sovereignty is taken away from states to be replaced by intergovernmental organizations that act as groups bound by treaties and loyalty agreements. Ideology is the powerful new force at the heart of this international influence on foreign policy. The Cold War period divided right-wing and left-wing ideologues who, although traditionally capitalist and communist ideologies emanating from individual states, became global forces influencing a new class of foreign policy. Countries loyal to the capitalists adopted a manufactured approach in the replica version of the capitalist nation, while the same applied to those attracted to the communist side. The new foreign policy class that emerged from this era revolutionized how international actors shaped a state's foreign policy. Through persuasion, aid and incentives the USSR influenced the internal systems especially of third world countries. The alliances' intense lobbying activities have highlighted the undisputed influences the international community has on how even domestic issues respond to foreign policy. This is a dangerous path because sovereignty is compromised in favor of economically powerful states. They have an advantage to actualize their interests. Sovereignty causes weak states to be victims of collisions due to conflicts of giant economies. Vietnam is an example where conflicting interests can lead countries to divide due to conflict resulting in a violent civil war. This has led in some cases to the intervention of international actors who have contributed to restoring peace and securityprosperity of communities, as in the case of South Sudan. However, in economies like India and China, their economic progress is helping national influence grow more. The emergence of a new generation of leaders in these countries who advocate greater independence and a domestic foreign policy is helping to restore this sovereignty to them. However, this newfound independence gives them the ability to more independently analyze an approach that benefits them more in terms of protecting their own national interests than previously serving interests that benefit other actors more than themselves. In short, they are able to adopt more approaches that garner or safeguard their interest better than before. In this new setup it is adapted to a more responsive and proactive model that serves India's interests. The factor of international systems has had a great influence especially in the post-Cold War era. From issues relating to trade, security, human rights, democracy, governance systems, the globalization of culture, freedom, markets and the increase in terrorism have also transformed sovereign states into a global village model in which the degree of sovereignty is minimal. The level of connectedness of these states is so high that they can only maintain independence but maintain extensive consultations with their partners and other actors. Globalization, even if it has not been rightly declared, has taken away the independence of individual states in decisions, initiative and execution of foreign policy. The European Union is an example of the inevitable need for economies to harmonize some of their foreign policy decision-making bodies. This led to an approach where, although made up of individual states, they unified their foreign policy bodies to maintain one body that could help make their foreign policy that was similar in matters of trade, security, crisis response and international issues. The security threat posed by terrorism has played an important role in the new class of internationalism that further threatens the sovereignty of state foreign policy. Now countries are grouped into alliances like NATO, which although dominated by strong powers remains an organization whose coercive power is high among its members. The identity of these intergovernmental organizations demonstrates how the international environment is slowly replacing national influence on foreign affairs. Foreign policy as a nationally prepared phenomenon within states is slowly evolving towards a new generation of foreign policy as an international phenomenon. . It can be argued that the main sectors that are affected by or that contribute to shaping foreign policy are slowly dissolving in a global atmosphere that, in addition to slowly shifting focus from national interests to regional interests in relation to geographical locations, political ideology, treaties and agreements or market freedoms. Domestic influence may be quickly ceding in favor of international systems as key players, but they are also the giants of other growing regional blocs. The key to note is the fact that leadership personality is at the forefront of these changes IN ISOLATED CASES. International systems as an influence on foreign policy are on the rise. The world has become a global village and the discipline of foreign policy is rapidly adapting to these new changes. Sovereign states are entangled in issues that even foreign policy decision-making bodies think are outwardly driven not only by their own unique interest but by their close international partners. Overlooking this fact will mean.