Topic > Why performance-enhancing drugs should be banned at all levels of sport

Performance-enhancing drugs have existed in sport for centuries, which has inevitably had consequences for the health of athletes and the sports industry. Sports have been directly linked to the use of performance-enhancing agents since the original Olympic Games in Greece, a spectacle that took place between the years 776 and 393 BC. Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) have become a public problem since they were banned in most sports, but have continued to be predominantly used, impacting the sports industry, physical health and psychological well-being of athletes using performance-enhancing drugs. Performance-enhancing drugs have led to higher levels of performance from athletes, increasing the entertainment factor at a professional level, but have also damaged the ethics of sport. Users experience both positive and negative changes in physical health, with some changes being permanent and irreversible. From a psychological point of view, the effects of performance-enhancing drugs can be considered appropriate in very limited situations, however, the consequences of long-term use have proven to be harmful to the mental health of consumers. Doping substances have been used in sports to enhance the athlete's strength and speed, which increases his overall performance but consequently damages the essence of sports and are dangerous to the physical and mental health of users and therefore must be prohibited at all levels sports. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayPerformance-enhancing drugs are used in sports to improve the performance of athletes. As elite athletes use performance-enhancing drugs, the entertainment factor in watching live sporting events would increase, as it would lead to athletes unlocking a new level of potential. There are also cases where athletes' failure to use performance-enhancing drugs could mean they refrain from competing seriously. An extremely competitive sport like professional bodybuilding requires constant muscle growth from athletes. An athlete participating in professional bodybuilding has almost no choice but to resort to performance-enhancing substances if he wishes to participate competitively. It has been stated that, adding all quotes, "Many involved in bodybuilding competitions believe they cannot compete without using steroids to reach what they describe as their potential." Therefore, in this case, doping drugs may be perceived as necessary. Allowing elite athletes to use performance-enhancing drugs could dramatically increase entertainment at live sporting events such as rugby, basketball, boxing and soccer. Fost (2005) suggests that the concept that performance-enhancing drugs provide an unfair advantage has no coherent evidence or argument to support it. He also states: “What is more right, the use of a team of sports specialists or a simple pill? What is the difference between training at altitude and taking erythropoietin to achieve a similar effect?” Legalizing PEDs in sports can increase the entertainment factor. however, this would cause sport to lose its spirit of fairness and become a competition to access the best substances; as well as providing negative role models to children and adolescents. For centuries the spirit of sport has evolved around “ethics, fairness and honesty” (Murofushi, 2014) and the legalization of the use ofSteroids would eradicate these values ​​in sports. Since its introduction into elite sport, the former president of the World Anti-Doping Agency, Richard Pound, believes that PEDs have been used not to provide fairness to the user, but to provide an unfair physical advantage with the hope that the its use is unknown. The exposure of its unjust nature was first recognized when “the International Athletics Federation (IAAF) became the first organization ever to ban the use of performance-enhancing drugs.” The ban imposed first by the IAAF in 1928 and later by other organizations was to ensure that the sport remained a challenge of talent and skill, along with tests of the athlete's dedication and character. If organizations decided to legalize the use of performance-enhancing drugs, “sporting events would increasingly become tests of rivals' access to good pharmaceutical technology” (Dixon, 2008) rather than of skill or ability in sport. If the use of performance-enhancing drugs became more widespread in sports leagues, fans and spectators of professional sports would perceive the role of skills replaced by the substances and therefore lose interest in the sport, financially damaging sports leagues and competitions. It is widely accepted that young athletes emulate elite professionals. Richard Schwab believes that steroid use by professional athletes will lead young athletes to assume that PEDs are safe to use and that this is in part an elite athlete. To preserve the classic values ​​of sport and ensure that young athletes do not perceive drug use as normal behavior, it is necessary to ban the use of performance-enhancing substances in sport. Performance-enhancing drugs cause physical changes in the body, athletes use performance-enhancing drugs to gain positive benefits while they may not be aware of the large number of negative effects on their physical health. Performance-enhancing drugs provide physical benefits to those who use them, but they also introduce risks to physical well-being. Athletes use PED to take advantage of its exercise capacity-enhancing effect, allowing athletes to endure excessive amounts of resistance training and cardiovascular exercise resulting in increased lung capacity, overall strength, muscle mass, and density. Athletes also use the effects of performance-enhancing substances to combat injuries and speed up the injury healing process. In 2004, a group of anonymous scientists selected 12 websites and published an anonymous survey aimed at PED users. The survey results showed that over 75% of the survey participants were non-professional athletes (Evans and Parkinson, 2006). This indicates that the main purpose of steroid use is aesthetic benefit. Most people who exercise regularly for extended periods of time struggle to achieve the body aesthetic they desire due to genetic disadvantages. Research has shown that muscles require a minimum of 24 hours of resting recovery time for the muscle to recover to full health. Performance-enhancing drugs allow athletes to shorten this "recovery time" and begin the next exercise regimen almost immediately, meaning it will allow professional and amateur athletes to achieve their desired athletic performance or body in a span of shorter time. This would allow time to focus on other important aspects of life such as the progress of their studies or their respected career ambitions. However, although the chemicals in PED cause changes in the,.