IndexIntroductionObjectiveTypes of Terrorist ActivitiesRevolutionarySub-RevolutionaryEstablishmentHistoryImplications of TerrorismConclusionIntroductionIt is the use of violence to create fear in a population using a systematic way in order to gain financial, political, religious or any gain other ideological cause. While no definitive definition is available, the definitions treat all acts of terrorism, regardless of their motivations, as simple criminal activity. Terrorism with different bases has different and very distinct ways of manifesting itself but they all share several elements. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on the topic "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get an Original Essay The primary involvement of terrorism is the creation and spread of fear, not only among direct victims but among a broad public. Objective Terrorists seek to attract publicity and maintain it in order to generate widespread fear. Violent, high-profile attacks such as kidnappings, car bombings, suicide bombings, hostage-taking and hijackings must increase. Although the victims are random, the locations are carefully selected for their shock value. Places like schools. Shopping malls, train stations, nightclubs and churches have always been targeted because they attract large crowds and because the civilian population feels safe and comfortable. The main goal of terrorism is to destroy the public's sense of safety in places they are most familiar with. Major targets include buildings or locations that are important political symbols, such as military installations or embassies. With these provocative acts the population will be induced to put pressure on political leaders towards a certain political direction. Types of Terrorist Activities There are many different types of terrorist activities. Therefore, the fact that there are many terrorist movements makes it impossible for a single theory to cover them all. not only because the goals, memberships, beliefs and resources of the groups involved are extremely different, but also the political contexts of their campaigns. There is a popular typology that identifies three types of terrorism: revolutionary. Sub-revolutionary. Establishment terrorism. Revolutionary. Revolutionary is considered the most common form of terrorism. Those who practice this form of terrorist activity oppose a political system that seeks its abolition and replacement with new structures. Its modern examples are the campaigns of activity of the German Red Army, the Peruvian Via Luminosa, etc., each of which attempted to overthrow a national regime in their respective countries. Subrevolutionary is a less common form of terrorism. It is used to change the existing socio-political structure but not to overthrow the existing regime. Members of sub-revolutionary groups are difficult to identify as this is achieved through the use of threats to depose the existing government or regime. A quick example is the South African ANC whose complaint aimed to end apartheid in the country. So-called state or state-sponsored terrorism is employed by governments or more often by factions within the government against citizens, factions within the government or against foreign governments or groups. This type or form of terrorism is difficult to identify, but it is the most common of all. This would mainly be due to the fact that state support is always hidden. The most persistent element of establishment terrorism, unlike other forms of terrorism, is that of secrecy. States try to disavow their active involvement in such acts in order to evade theinternational criticism and avoid political or military revenge by their targets.HistoryTerrorism has been practiced by non-state and state-sponsored organizations for many years throughout the world. The prime examples of terror cited today are the activity of the Jewish Sicarii who frequently and violently attacked their fellow Jews suspected of conspiring with the Roman authority. Likewise during the French Revolution the Terror was openly supported by Robspierre, while the Spanish Inquisition arrested arbitrarily tortured and executed to punish what was seen as religious dissent. With the end of the American Civil War in 1865, Southern rebels formed the Ku Klux Klan to intimidate those who supported Reconstruction (1865-1877) and those who were formerly slaves. In the mid-19th century, terror was also adopted in Russia, Western Europe, and the United States by supporters of revolution who believed that assassinating people in positions of power was the best way to implement revolutionary socio-political policies. This led to the assignment of kings, prime ministers, government officials and even presidents, from 1865 to 1905, by anarchists. In the 20th and 21st centuries we have witnessed intense changes in the use and practice of terror to drive political agendas. The 20th century itself has become a hallmark of many different political movements that span extremely left to right of the political field. Vast technological progress has given terrorists new mobility and lethality. Innovations such as automatic weapons and electrically marked devices have led to this level of evolution. Terrorism seems to continue to characterize political life. Before the major global attacks of the recent past, there was widespread fear that the destructive power of terrorists could significantly increase and reach greater proportions through the use of weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. An example is the 1995 Tokyo subway nerve gas firing by the Japanese cult AUM Shinrikyo. Since the 20th century, ideologies and political interventions have led many countries to engage in international terrorism, often under the guise of supporting national liberation movements. Therefore, it has become a common saying that “one man's terrorism is another man's liberation struggle”. The distinction between terrorism and other forms of political violence has disappeared – largely because many terrorist groups have often resorted to terrorist tactics – and administrative and legal issues have remained equally hidden. These problems have led social scientists to develop a definition of terrorism that is not based on criminality but on the fact that the victims of terrorist violence are often innocent citizens. While this definition is flexible, it is sometimes expanded to include a number of other factors, such as whether terrorist acts are carried out secretly or subtly and whether terrorist acts are intended to create great fear. Towards the end of the 20th century, the term “ecoterrorism” was used to describe acts of environmental destruction carried out for ulterior political or military purposes, such as the burning of Kuwait's oil resources by the Iraqi army during the Iraq War. Persian Gulf. The term has also been applied to certain environmental risks even if criminal acts, such as timber twisting, were intended to disrupt or prevent activities suspected of being harmful to the environment. Implications of Terrorism Terrorism aims to create terror, a sense of insecurity, and the concept that leaders can no longer protect those in power. It leaves people in awe and has an emotional impact that lives.