Today, almost 70 years after independence, things have changed in many ways. The military has repeatedly proven itself to be an apolitical organization, standing out both in times of peace turmoil and in times of war. In the words of George Orwell; “We sleep peacefully at night because rough men are ready to use violence on those who would harm us.” Furthermore, unlike many other countries, the specter of a military takeover does not scare political leaders in India, or at least it should not scare them, given the impeccable record of the past. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Therefore, no other organization should be more entitled to the protection of its constitutional rights than the men who risk their lives every day, to protect the sovereignty of the country. It is not just a matter of gratitude to be shown to those who dedicate their lives to the country, giving up the luxuries of life and the fight against extremes. But it also becomes necessary to grant certain immunities to the Armed Forces to facilitate them in discharging their duty of maintaining or restoring order in any area of ​​the country's territory. Enlightened democratic nations around the world have rational and liberal rules regarding this matter. It is necessary to understand why a separate justice system is needed, to recognize the need for variance in the justice system for the military. Rapid decision making is a requirement for military functioning in modern warfare and cannot be achieved by a debating society. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The military has developed its own laws and traditions. Many times, a commander's decisions must be enforced through his subordinates. The primary objective of the Armed Forces is to fight or be ready to fight so that the instance does not arise. The army constitutes a specialized community governed by its own laws. These laws distinguish military crimes such as desertion, disobedience of orders and dereliction of duty, exclusively from civil crimes, keeping in mind the need to punish such crimes to ensure discipline for achieving the primary objectives of the military. No civil law equivalent can be juxtaposed in parallel to explain the need to enforce discipline. The need arises for a different legal status and procedures for the two. This requires that certain special privileges and defenses be granted to the military and armed forces in order to protect the actions taken by them in lieu of their duty to protect the country's sovereignty, national security and to maintain order, peace and the tranquility in the country. Therefore, it is important to study why the State must ensure that these needs are also met by the Constitution.