This presentation will focus on the topic of discussion: Most immigrants come to the United States only to get on welfare. With more than 40 million residents born in a different country, the United States has more immigrants than any other country and this number is growing. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Why immigrants come to the United States and whether they should be entitled to public assistance and welfare here is not a new topic of debate. Most recently, the Trump administration's public charge rule calls for rejecting prospective immigrants deemed eligible to use public welfare programs, which include: Supplemental Security Income; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); any federal, state, local or tribal cash benefit programs for income maintenance; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Section 8 Housing Assistance through the Housing Choice Voucher Program or Project-Based Rental Assistance; and Medicaid. Arguments about why immigrants come to the United States focus on rates of welfare recipients within immigrant communities and welfare magnets or welfare clustering. Because California has more immigrants than any other state and is considered the most generous in terms of welfare, it is also at the center of this debate. The data can be manipulated to support both sides of the argument about immigrants coming to the United States to get welfare. Federal and state policies limit the programs that social worker clients can receive. Professionals must understand applicable federal and state policies to effectively advocate for their clients and provide them with relevant assistance. Furthermore, limited access to public benefits is likely to increase dependency on private welfare. It is important that social workers serving in private agencies and nonprofit organizations understand the challenges their clients face. This study used data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to study the difference in welfare participation rates between immigrants and natives. Americans. Borjas used CPS data on the poverty rate and participation rate in public assistance programs. Childhood poverty is a determining factor in lower educational achievement, behavioral problems and lower economic earnings as adults. Overall, childhood poverty continues into adulthood and, thereafter, potential dependence on public assistance. Participating in public assistance as a child has long-term consequences. In particular, exposure to public assistance as a child can foster a culture of dependency in adulthood. This study found that national origin groups that had high rates of program participation as children are also the national origin groups from which young adults have the highest rates of poverty and program participation. Immigrant children have significantly higher rates of poverty and, as a result, participate in welfare programs at higher rates than their native-born peers. Nearly half of immigrant children live in families receiving some form of public assistance, while only a third of their native-born peers live in families receiving assistance. In general, foreign-born children have the highest poverty rate, but children born in the United States to immigrant parents have the highest rate of participation in poverty programs..