Apart from the different manifestations relating to children, the Indian Penal Code (IPC) also provides a rundown of crimes against children. According to segments 82 and 83 of the IPC, a child who commits an offense and is less than seven years of age is not considered to have committed an offence. A child between the ages of seven and twelve and who is believed to have a child-like understanding of the outcomes of his or her activities is also considered unequipped to commit a tort. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Segments 315 and 316 talk about the crime of child feticide and murder. If a man presents a demonstration with the intention of preventing the child from being conceived while alive or a demonstration leading to the death of the child after birth, that person is presenting feticide/child murder until he does so in light of a legitimate concern for the mother's well-being or life. If a man completes a demonstration amounting to culpable death involving the sudden death of an unborn child, he will be charged with manslaughter. Area 305 states that it is an offense for any individual to encourage the suicide of a child, that is, a man who has not reached the age of eighteen. Segment 317 states that it is a tort against children, if their mother or father discovers or leaves a young person in a place with the aim of surrendering. This does not prevent the law from prosecuting further if surrender results in the boy's death. The guardians would then be charged with felony manslaughter or murder. There are various segments in the IPC that talk about capture and kidnapping. Area 360 says the hijacking from India is characterized by the movement of a man beyond the outskirts of India without their consent. 361 provides that if a male minor not yet sixteen years old and a female minor not yet eighteen years old are taken away from the legitimate sentinels without their consent, it is considered kidnapping from legal guardianship. Segment 362 characterizes kidnapping as compelling, convincing, or misleading that drives a man from a place. Segment 363-A states that it is a misdemeanor to grab or injure a minor for the purpose or business of asking. In the event that a man is discovered using a minor to ask, and that individual is not the lawful custodian of the child, it is accepted that the child was seized with the end goal of working in asking. Area 364 states that any individual who seizes another for the sake of killing or discarding them in a manner that would induce murder is deserving of the law. Segment 364-A characterizes hijacking as any individual who kidnaps another to undermine, harm, or massacre that individual who seeks to convince the administration, or some other external or state association, to do or not do any demonstration. Area 365 talks about seizure to subtly or unfairly limit someone. Area 366 states that it is a wrong to force, urge or abuse a woman to leave a place for the specific purpose of forcing her into marriage or tempting or engaging in unlawful sex with the ruffian or someone else. A unique provision where such a tort is brought against a young female minor who has not reached the age of eighteen. Segment 367 states that it is a wrong to seize a man with a specific end goal to cause him shocking pain, place him in servitude, or subject him to a man's unnatural desire. Section 369 deals with a particular offense of abduction of a child under 10 years of age with the ultimate aim of taking him away. Sexual offenses against children are also covered under the IPC. Segment 372 examines the offer of a boy (under the age of eighteen) with 372.