The Trade Union Act, 1926 encourages the formation of multiple trade unions in an establishment as it stipulates that seven or more workers can not only form a trade union but can also apply it for registration under the Act, which may reduce industrial peace and harmony and increase inter- and intra-union revelations. This law also grants the union leadership an auspice from the liability of malefactors and civilians in carrying out the union's intrigues. Labor leaders have used this authorized protection to create industrial unrest, which can hinder the horizontal functioning of industries. This law also provides a license for outsiders to interfere in the functioning of unions as office holders. Ultimately it concludes that the existing labor legislation in India has not regulated in a way that encourages global labor accelerated production and both the above mentioned laws need to be amended at the earliest to make them more contemporary for job creation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Saini DS (2014) explains that since 1991 the industrial paradigm in India has been moving in the direction of ecumenical competition, organizational effectiveness, good organization and joint teamwork. Using this research paper, he examined the approach to the Trade Union Act, 1926/, the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946/ and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which worked and to what extent they are contemporary in today's business environment in India. Sarkar P. and Deakin S. (2011) discussed the correlation between labor regulation, industrial production and unemployment using leximetric methods. Based on an econometric time series analysis, they recognized the inverse relationship between labor law and unemployment in border perspectives, while squat unemployment leads to the implementation of pro-worker labor laws. However, India's eccentrically worker-friendly labor laws have been a major obstacle to industrial intensification and the development of the formal sector (registered employment) at the expense of the informal sector (unregistered employment).Deakin S. and Haldar A.(2015 ) said that labor laws protecting workers in India are not contemporary today and are often expressed as rigid/traditional/outdated. Therefore, they are unable to meet today's needs and generally create a hindrance in our rapidly growing economy. Such labor laws discourage investors from investing in India and this certainly intensifies the unemployment problem in India. India's labor laws are set at an inappropriate level for a developing economy, which would otherwise be able to use cheaper labor as a domestic environmental factor, which certainly offers a comparative advantage over trading rivals. In the last general elections, the focal point of Narendra Modi's campaign was the promise that he would make to India just as he did in Gujarat as Prime Minister. The "Gujarat development model" has been described as a pro-business approach, offering a package of improved infrastructure with good governance and minimal intervention from the state government. The Gujarat model emphasizes reform of governance structures as a corridor for progress, with deregulation of labor laws as a major aspect of this progression. For the Government of India, labor law reform raises the question of whether.