Knowledge production can be defined as the methods of generating ideas that will be useful for understanding some concepts of human being. Knowledge production is something that takes time to accomplish. Knowledge sharing is an activity through which knowledge is communicated to people, organization and family. The most important thing in this title of prescription is how the knowledge is produced and how it is produced. I believe that knowledge must be produced in a group to be more concrete and true, work done alone can also be true but may have some uncertainties and random errors. Every person wants to leave something for the next generation, we can call this act of sharing knowledge. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Reason and language can be used as a means of knowledge, because shared knowledge must be produced by a group of people to be more reliable, but in the case of personal knowledge there may be some limitation in communication due to which understanding will be difficult for the generation. Every human being has their own way of reasoning about the situation, but it is not all the way of reasoning that is right, because someone's point of view is not the same as another's. A scientist may realize that some particular aspects of life have not yet been clearly explored such as the existence of spirits; the existence of the invisible world and more. The scientist will try to make some discovery about them which, in his opinion, can be beneficial to society. This will be the case with personal knowledge because he will use his imagination and also develop his perspectives. He will use his reasoning to analyze well and conclude his statement based on your answer. The uses of language will depend more on the understanding of its arguments. Some people will refuse to accept his resolution, because the scientist made the analogy himself and will expect the help of other scientists to make him more confident in his discovery. Finally, the scientist shared knowledge through his analysis, and this will be passed on over time, to the future generation, even if his name dies, it will remain in history. For example we have the case of John Dalton a scientist who made an analogy later discovered that atoms are indivisible according to the result of that analogy, but later over the years other scientists made the same analogy but discovered that atoms can be divisible and is composed of protons, neutrons, electrons, with those Consequently we can see how John Dalton's analogy was wrong. This example shows us how working in a group can give good and clear results, but working alone may contain some errors that will give incorrect results. Sometimes human beings have dreams that they expect and want to realize. They will try to do it themselves, but he may find that he no longer has any ideas or strength to do it. They will try to do it themselves, but he may find that he has no more ideas or that the strength demands it. Working in a team will be a good idea, because it will increase the necessary manpower and skills. We have as an example the case of Cluster Evolution, where the author who has the idea of ​​the experiment of the dynamic evolution of a star model. His goal was to learn more about the evolution of a cluster, from initial and final conditions using the broadest type of techniques, also compare and then analyze the results. His commitment was to delivera comparable analysis of other techniques in the exhibition at the IAU General Assembly in Kyoto. According to him, this will be a good opportunity to present his work to colleagues and what he has discovered about the evolution of the star cluster model. He finally got the results of his experiment. The author of the experiment used language to communicate with others and share his ideas with colleagues. He used reason to achieve his goals and achieve good results. Personal example: in module 4 the teacher gave us a physics task, which we were supposed to do in a group of 4 people, it should have taken into account our participation in class. The task was to find the mass of all the planets in the solar system; we decided to divide the work by giving everyone the task of finding the mass of two planets since there are eight in total. Everyone in the group worked well and we accomplished the task easily, because there were many people involved. We did well in our analysis and the teacher gave us a good grade. This example shows how working in a group can give good results, thanks to the good analysis done by the members. That's why when you work collaboratively try to find people who are equally interested in what they are doing. With the above arguments, we can see how collaborative task can be generally beneficial in the area of ​​natural sciences, also it can be a good area of ​​knowledge production in Some people have a habit of working on something alone, with the aims to prove to society that they are strong and capable of producing something, that's why they don't like collaborative work, because they know that the rewards and honor will be shared. In art there are some artists who revolutionized their time by bringing a new style. Some people have principles according to their religion or culture that they cannot upset, because this would go against their belief. That is why they will not agree with what is false according to their tradition. Knowledge can be produced through past experiment, but a good argument cannot be confident at all because the work does it itself, someone can paint a board with the aim of sharing a message, the message he wants to share can be good but depending on how the community perceives it, some community members may see it as a non-benefit for them. For example I went to Foumban in the Institute of Art and Culture and I saw many frescoes, one of them caught my attention was a table of a naked woman breastfeeding her baby with her breasts, the painter said that his message was to show the benefit of maternal nutrition, but other people consider it perverse because the woman was naked. If this work had been done collaboratively, some people might have seen that the naked woman can influence the sensitivity of others. They will change this. Someone may have the idea of ​​painting something on the wall of a building; its objective may be to present the cultural and tourist diversity of a country. To do this he will have to cross the country presenting his project and also asking some questions regarding his task to get more information and reasoning about them to find clear arguments. As he walks around the country doing some research, he will gain more skills, ideas and evidence that will support his arguments, as well as increase the personal knowledge required. He will reproduce the knowledge he has acquired but he will be able to change some aspects and add his personal knowledge. It will produce art-based knowledge; people will accept his messages because they will know that he has learned about many cultures before.