The article regarding Saluda's drinking water appears in a health and fitness magazine. The article contains several hypotheses involving tap and bottled water. Laboratory studies demonstrate that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains many minerals associated with good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Saluda residents are hospitalized less frequently than the national average, and in this case they assume that's because more people are drinking bottled water rather than tap water. Although the article gives several reasons as to why it is beneficial to drink bottled water, these are not valid because there are many other reasons to their assumptions which I will explain in the following text. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay There are many answers to the article's assumptions but they are not listed because the city is trying to promote a healthy lifestyle as well as their bottling water. First, the article states that Saluda residents are hospitalized less frequently, which provides no evidence that this is due to drinking bottled water. In other words, the explanation for why this happens may have nothing to do with water in general, but with the fact that these are healthy people overall. Another assumption is that tap water is not necessarily “bad” for you, but that bottled water is healthier for your well-being. In this case, they are just trying to promote bottled water because, even though laboratory studies show that it is healthier, there is no direct evidence that leads to the conclusion that tap water is unhealthy anyway. As a result, no other brands of water bottles are mentioned; so it's assumed that everyone drinks that kind, not to mention why everyone is healthier. Additionally, there may be many other brands (e.g. Aquafina, Pure Life, Dasani, Natural Springs, etc.) that are close to, if not better than the so-called “leading brand” that everyone drinks. Throughout the article, based on the information provided, several components and reasoning behind their “facts” are missing. Although a laboratory study was provided, no evidence linking bottled water to healthier people was provided. Assuming that it contains several beneficial minerals and is free of bacteria, it can also be a negative result since bottled water is the main cause of pollution, which later ends up becoming the air we breathe, which could put us at risk. In support of this theory, some studies have shown that every year more than 80% of recyclable plastic bottles end up in landfills. They do not decompose naturally and release toxic chemicals when they eventually decompose. Other reasons why tap water is more beneficial than bottled water are: it is healthier for our environment, tap water is frequently tested for bacteria such as E.coli and Cryptosporidium and other harmful contaminants, l Tap water is tested just as well as bottled water, etc. As previously listed in the previous paragraph, the author has failed to support or address additional information with supporting evidence. There are several missing components and missing material that could have made the article better information. It seems that the bottled water company Natural Springs is against tap water, but little do they know, all water is treated the same and even though bottled water contains "healthy minerals", it also contains.