Topic > The need to accept laws to allow assisted suicide

In a study, The Truth About Suicide, researchers found that at least 10% of suicides in Britain are linked to terminal or chronic illnesses, causing more than 400 deaths per year. Around 46 British citizens travel abroad to Dignitas in Switzerland for assisted suicide each year. According to the Oxford Learner's Dictionary, “the act of a person ending his or her life with the help of a doctor, because he or she is suffering from an illness for which there is no cure.” In another way, the term means that it is a way to help a person suffering from an incurable disease accompanied by unbearable pain and mental agony. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay "In the UK helping anyone to commit suicide is a crime". Under Section 2 of the Suicide Act 1961, as originally enacted, provided that it was an offense to "aid, abet, advise or procure the suicide of another" and that a person who committed this offense was liable to imprisonment for a term not less than or more than fourteen years. In assisted dying cases, family members were not convicted for helping them, although some were charged and had to wait to hear the charges dropped. If we look back in history, the first law on assisted dying was introduced. from Dr. C. Killick Millard, President of the Society of Medical Officers of Health in 1931 and now in 2016, Conservative peer Lord Hayward has reintroduced the Assisted Dying Bill into the Lords and yet it is still underway. I agree that we need to legalize assisted dying, the law forces the dying to have a painful and gruesome death. Due to the absence of an assisted dying law, people taking their own lives behind closed doors can make a dying person's situation worse. But they are unable to have an open dialogue with their doctor or family. Discussing their idea about assisted dying with someone could implicate them in a crime with a possible 14-year prison sentence. However, it is against the ethical Hippocratic Oath for a doctor to use euthanasia, but he is the only person who can free a patient from intense suffering or pain due to illness for some reason for which the doctor took the oath to treat it, doing their assistance to a person who wants to die peacefully due to his suffering and marking it as illegal and punishing him is inappropriate. Many countries like Australia, France, USA, etc. have taken a stand in legalizing euthanasia or assisted dying, to help those in need. More than 90% of the UK population believes assisted dying should be legalized for those suffering from terminal illnesses, according to an opinion poll showing growing support for a change in the law. If forcing a person to live with suffering against their will is a law, then what purpose does the right to freedom and life serve? Is forcing someone to live with suffering against their will a right or a crime rather than letting them pass their intention peacefully, which is labeled a crime? Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get Custom Essay Overall, I believe that in current times, with the evolution of society, there is a need for advancement of in-laws, the law says that it is a human right of the person to liberty and life, but the same law dominates such rights forcing the person to live forcibly against his will with suffering, that is.