The artifact I chose at the Art Institute of Chicago is titled Statuette of a Striding Figure. The figurine of a walking figure is considered the oldest artifact currently on display at the Art Institute of Chicago today. It has existed for 5,000 years and has been dated to around 3,100 BC by the Proto-Elamite culture. This culture is one of the earliest cultures around that hotbed of civilization called the ancient Near East. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. This statue is 17.5cm tall and 5.4cm wide. It is made of copper alloy (metal sculpture). The technique to make it was to melt the material and throw it. Although it is mainly a copper compound, it has a stone or shell on it. He's a solid piece of the cast. There is another version of him that was made exactly the same way, although it is on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. The only difference between it and the one at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is that the one in New York does not have a clear face like that of the Art Institute of Chicago. The one in Chicago has a clear face like eyes, nose and mouth, but the one in New York has a broken face. This statue which is currently on display at the Art Institute of Chicago differs from today's statues in its quality, age, and irregularity of its subject matter and physical formation - with one special case, its replica. The general meaning of this artifact is to tell the story of a supernatural being that brings people from the physical world to the spiritual world and how some cultures have their own beliefs in the past. The statuette of a strident figure is one of the museum's oldest pieces than any other artifact at the Art Institute of Chicago. It also has a greenish color, unlike any other artifact. In this artifact, it appears that the statue is walking, because the statue swings its hands while moving its right leg forward. His horned headdress and long, curved boots are similarly shaped. In this piece, it also appears that the statue is looking at something as if it is crazy because its eyes are wide open and looking straight ahead. Furthermore, his fists are clenched. This statute is muscular and has a very long beard. He also appears to be wearing something on his back, although it's unclear what it is. He also wears a belt. Upon a closer look, you can see that this artifact is very well detailed. It provides lots of little details and textures. In this artifact, its original greenish color is almost permanently lost on the upper shoulders and legs. As it gets older, its green color is changing and it seems like it now has two colors: the copper color inside and the green. This statue also seems to be associated with an animal because the statue wears animal horns. In fact, this statue seems like a supernatural being because of the way he is shown wearing unusual things like a headdress with animal horns. This shows that they are significant because they know what they are doing. The reason I choose this artifact is that their culture and belief are unique to me. It is also unique to me because they were the first culture of the Proto-Elamite culture. The horned headdress he wore is meant to represent his power. Their culture believed in the non-existent such as the supernatural world and the sprite. In fact, they created the statue which is the figurine of a walking figure made of copper so that they can express their cultural beliefs in a way that lasts a long time. This belief in the supernatural world by the Photo-Elamite culture is important because many cultures today still believe in a supernatural world.For example, many cultures today believe in ghosts, monsters, or demons. The “supernatural world” emerged early Proto-Elamite culture seems to have a connection today. Therefore, this artifact is special because it not only represents the beliefs of the proto-Elamite culture of the past, but also appears to have a connection to what we believe today. Another reason why choosing a walking figure figurine is important to me is because I was impressed by how it was made especially with copper alloy about 5,000 years ago. The color used in the figurine made me think of the technology available at the time. Their technology must have already advanced because they knew how to create something that could last a long time, considering the figurine is 5,000 years old. I was struck by their technique and technology and the way they chose copper on this particular statue. For example, they could have made it out of wood or limestone like most other newer artifacts, although it is a solid copper alloy and an unbreakable statue. After looking closely at this statue, it reminded me of Winter's article where he talks about narrative in art: how art can provide a narrative without necessarily having a brief description of the statue or the art. Looking at this statue, I might already have a sense of what it will be about. For example, when I first discovered this statute at the museum, I knew it would provide historical context about a supernatural without reading the descriptions. The way it is shown already has meaning. After spending enough time and effort staring at this figurine, this figurine makes me feel emotional or sad when I look at his face. The figurine's face appears disappointed or sad, as if it were asking someone for something. However, at the same time I felt scared because I had never seen anything like this before: his appearance and the way he wears certain things like a horned headdress and pointy boots. I couldn't understand how wearing a horned headdress represents the fact that he is at the top of his people. Also, the one displayed in New York looks even creepier than the one in the Chicago museum because the one in New York's face is messed up. In this case, the face of the Walking Figure Statue looks disappointed because its eyes were wide open and the statue's face looks unhappy. The statue's face did not smile or move its mouth. Instead only the eyes opened. Also, the body suggests sadness or pleading because his back is not straight and he appears to be trying to reach for something he wants. The style of the figurine of a walking figure created by the Proto-Elamite culture is similar to the figurine of the so-called “priest-king” that we talked about in our lecture. “The figurine of the so-called “priest-king” and the figurine of a walking figure are both male human figurines. Both have similar movements like hand gestures and both wear a hat. Furthermore, both have long beards and clenched fists. The “Statuette of the so-called “priest-king” is dated to the late Uruk period (3300-3100 BC) found in Iran. Furthermore, these two artifacts both have faces. Although the "Statuette of a Walking Figure" has a greenish color, the "Priest-King" is colored gray. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Overall, after exploring many different artifacts at the Art Institute, the Statuette of a Walking Figure, in particular, stuck with me because I feel very connected to it because of its uniqueness. It was the oldest piece in the gallery and only two exist, while the other is on display in New York. Unlike.