Topic > Anti-Federalists are more like Anti-Isotyrilists

The United States is a relatively strong but extremely divided country, the country was divided before it even became a country. In 1770 the United States was fighting for freedom from Great Britain, it had declared itself independent but needed a form of government. The founding fathers decided to create a constitution that gained a lot of support but also a lot of hate. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were the two sides, the Federalists believed that we should write a constitution and that we should have a strong central government. The Anti-Federalists did not approve of the Constitution, they believed that the government would be tyrannical and dictate the law. The Anti-Federalists were scared because they felt oppressed by King George III and did not believe the American government was “oppressive and tyrannical,” and they chose to vote against the American Constitution. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original EssayThe Anti-Federalists should not have worried about dictatorships because Britain at the time was not tyrannical, the only problem was that parliament was coming up with taxes on Americans and not King George III. Because King George had to share his power with Parliament, the Cabinet and the ministers, the English government was not an absolute monarchy. The English government actually had numerous controls in place to make sure one person didn't have too much power. King George was actually angry about the loss of the colonies due to parliament's taxes and expressed his disbelief in a letter when he even said: “America is lost! Must we fall under the blow? Or do we have resources that could repair the damage? What are these resources? Should we look for them in distant regions held by a precarious mandate, or should we look for them at home in the efforts of a new politics? This shows King George's anguish at the loss of the American colonies and shows how it was not his plan and how it was extremely unexpected, he went to great lengths to get them back using all his strength to try to force them into submission which seemed brutal but it was backed by good intentions. The great thing about King George was that his government was actually good and he ruled for a long time, he was a good king especially for a constitutional monarchy. The Anti-Federalists exaggerated King George's role in the laws and taxes imposed on them, even if he had a larger role in them he would still have limited power, so he could not have been a dictator, because then the whole country would be corrupt. The Anti-Federalists should have looked at the basic facts and not just their opinions. The Anti-Federalists didn't even know what a dictatorship was because they had never experienced one and there was no strong, known dictatorship in Western Europe. at that time and there hadn't been any for a long time. The closest dictatorship at that time was Napoleon, whose reign would come 15 years later, a few years after the French Revolution. Even if we talk about the French Revolution, revolutions are how most dictators gain power, there was no English rebellion that brought King George to power. The French Revolution occurred when French citizens took over the autocracy because they were acratic and oppressive. The French royal family at the time was not helping the country in its desperate time of need and was still wearing their extremely expensive clothes and throwing parties while the rest of the country was in chaos and ruin due to their extreme and crushing debt. The French Revolution arrived and created the conditions for the arrival of Napoleon, who took control of the.