Most high school students won't sit through the end of the year because they feel exhausted from seven long category periods and not to mention boredom. John Taylor Gatto, former New York State Teacher of the Year, wrote an article known as "anti-school." Gatto criticizes the university system for its inability to meet student expectations and for golf's limits on their ability to be told. Children feel neglected, and therefore teachers feel helpless because they need to interact with students and agencies do not seem to be curious about the materials they are provided. Gatto says, however, that U.S. high schools have suffered from adapting to the Prussian education system. In line with Gatto, the purpose of high school is to control the minds of female students to form a harmless and manageable society to learn to govern. This should not be the purpose of universities, however I believe the author presents true facts as to why the government would want this. Therefore, education should serve to help all students open their minds to the unknown, strengthen their abilities, help them observe choices for their future lives, and encourage students' minds and hearts to hear new things. Gatto's recommendation for a better education system is not to have a rigid institution, but to provide facilities to students who are in the low-level categories, and upgrade teachers' teaching methods, so the government will not benefit the scholars an the agency is doing badly in the faculties. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayIn fact, the author recalls this regarding James Bryant Conant's influence within the university system (Cat 36). Conant is responsible for the presence of most of the Prussian education system in most popular high schools, as well as months of university years, and thus for the collective action of thousands of students running a similar high school (Cat 36). The Prussian system wanted to control a person's talents to benefit government, to break the important thinking of students by implicating their commonplace to form a manageable society (Cat 36). The standardized test leaves students who have not scored decently on the test to be placed in low-level categories. He says the purpose of government is to assign a group of people to control and dominate a society whose expectations are low so that the government leads without being challenged or questioned. In this case, elders and academics should work together to encourage every student to do their best not to let the government block their dreams and goals. Furthermore, he made it clear that we tend not to want a compulsory institution like high faculties to get a decent education. He mentioned that the presidents and scientists of the World Health Organization did not go to school, but they were able to realize the simplest way of teaching themselves (Cat 35). They didn't follow a rigid structure, yet they managed to bring home bacon success. Once the person Thomas Edison started going to college, he was expelled because his teacher considered him difficult to handle. He was able to self-educate himself and became an excellent creator (Gatto 35). I think we could still use the university system to profit from the scholars that the World Organization ofHealthcare could not receive an education otherwise. Every student learns differently, as some students learn more with the visual learning method, some with the sensory mode, and some with the extremely proprioceptive method. For this reason, students should include the opportunity to interact in numerous category situations to encourage them to hear and hopefully become superior students. Not to mention, Gatto points out that the Purpose of the $64,000 University System in his essay has a dangerous impact on the life of a friend of mine. According to Gatto, "school is meant to label the unfit with low grades, remedial placements, and other punishments." For example, faculties allow students who have obtained low grades throughout the year to pass the grade exclusively by attending the academic session. I actually have a lover whose dreams have been shattered because of the system we currently have. Andrea's 11th grade was terribly difficult for her because her mother died at the beginning of her college year. He struggled with depression, and once in the honor categories in the last 3 years, he began to struggle with his categories. Once she reached seventh grade due to her poor performance in her first year, she was placed in the middle grade categories. She felt discouraged and someone only did what she requested to try to graduate. The result was that he forever lost the chance to get a scholarship to a university he would have attended. I would bring up the college's academic counsel and, why always wait to see them later to draw attention to a student's dangerous grades rather than warning their students at the beginning of their failing grades? The university system should reach out to students like Andrea to provide message support to help them deal with their personal problems. Academics should work with nerves and people have had specific students give them a warning sign to help them get back on the right track in a short time when the first failing grade comes. Furthermore, the author points out that the university system prepares an outsized group of scholars who have performed poorly in their academic years to do business work once they leave school (Gatto 37). The author reveals that «the school should develop the correct social role of each student. This can be done by working tests mathematically and anecdotally on cumulative records” (Gatto 36). Additionally, scholars are plagued by records of their tests that lead them to be placed at the lowest level of sophistication. These students leave school without a sense of purpose, lack the ability to look for work, or find work that has only occasional financial gain. They are ineffective for meeting the needs of a stable and dignified job or for applying for a scholarship. Therefore, the university system should encourage and provide assistance to scholars who do poorly and have a bad academic record. Given these points, the university system should let lectures engage scholars more in their learning method and apply new techniques with the aim of making students interact, participate, study and concentrate in school. I completely understand that teachers should follow a program within the category to get their students through. However, student lessons may require more time mentoring students as individuals than instructing an entire category. He believes students should be allowed to specialize in subjects that intrigue them. Having considered these points, the teachers.